The comparison of triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle and olecranon osteotomy approaches in the treatment of intercondylar fractures of the humerus

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAzboy, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAncar, Cahit
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorOzkul, Emin
dc.contributor.authorGem, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz, Hilmi
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:27:46Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:27:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of patients with intra-articular distal humerus fractures treated with triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle (TRAP) and olecranon osteotomy. METHODS: Forty patients with intra-articular distal humerus fractures were retrospectively analyzed. TRAP approach was used in 22 patients (12 males, 10 females; mean age 37.8 years, range 17-70), and olecranon osteotomy in 18 patients (11 males, 7 females; mean age 35.4 years, range 18-62). Fractures were classified using the AO/ASIF classification. Functional results were evaluated with the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score. RESULTS: The overall mean arc of elbow motion was 108 degrees (range 70 degrees-140 degrees) in the TRAP group, whereas that of the olecranon osteotomy group was 98 degrees (range 70 degrees-115 degrees). A significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of overall mean arc of elbow motion (p=0.038). There were no significant differences noted between the two groups in terms of mean MEPS and DASH scores (p=0.412, p=201, respectively). The overall complication rate was 27.2% in the TRAP group and 55% in the olecranon osteotomy group. CONCLUSION: TRAP is a succesful approach in the treatmet of intra-articular distal humerus fractures that provides better arc of elbow motion, reduces complications and reoperation rates.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/tjtes.2015.42948
dc.identifier.endpage65en_US
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27135080
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84956693264
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage58en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid199705
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2015.42948
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/199705
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/20185
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000369324400011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDistal Humerusen_US
dc.subjectInternal Fixationen_US
dc.subjectIntra-Articular Fractureen_US
dc.subjectOlecranon Osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectTrapen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle and olecranon osteotomy approaches in the treatment of intercondylar fractures of the humerusen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle and olecranon osteotomy approaches in the treatment of intercondylar fractures of the humerus
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu