Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorŞahbaz, Cafer
dc.contributor.authorBahsi, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorİnce, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorBakır, Elif Pınar
dc.contributor.authorÇellik, Ömer
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:59:32Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:59:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractFinishing and polishing techniques have great importance on the long term success and aesthetics of the composite restorations. In this study it was aimed to examine the effect of three different posterior composites on surface texture with various finishing and polishing procedures. Three different posterior composites, Filtek P60, Clearfil Majesty Posterior and Cavex Quadent Posterior Dense, and three different finishing and polishing procedures diamond finishing burs, tungsten carbide burs and Sof-Lex discs were used in the study. The specimens were 5mm in diameter and 2mm in height. The surface roughness was measured at three seperate points with a profilometer device and the Ra values were recorded. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis was applied for statistical analysis and p<0.05 was accepted significant. No statistically significant differences were found between the composite resins with respect to surface roughness (p>0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between the groups of diamond, carbide, and Sof-Lex groups (p<0.05). Sof-Lex polishing system was more successful than the diamond and carbide burs in the finishing and polishing procedures of composites. SCANNING 38:448-454, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citationŞahbaz, C., Bahsi, E., İnce, B., Bakır, E.P. ve Çellik, Ö. (2016). Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins. Scanning, 38(5), 448–454
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sca.21295
dc.identifier.endpage454en_US
dc.identifier.issn0161-0457
dc.identifier.issn1932-8745
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26752718
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84990190200
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage448en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21295
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14130
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sca.21295
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000386086100010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorBahsi, Emrullah
dc.institutionauthorİnce, Bayram
dc.institutionauthorBakır, Elif Pınar
dc.institutionauthorÇellik, Ömer
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Hindawien_US
dc.relation.ispartofScanning
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFinishing and Polishing Systemen_US
dc.subjectPosterior compositesen_US
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen_US
dc.subjectProfilometeren_US
dc.subjectScanning electron microscope (Sem)en_US
dc.titleEffect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resinsen_US
dc.titleEffect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Scanning - 2016 - Sahbaz - Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three.pdf
Boyut:
1.25 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu