The diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experience

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGedik, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorKayan, Devrim
dc.contributor.authorYamis, Sait
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorBircan, Kamuran
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:27:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:27:45Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate our approach to the diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the results of 107 patients with penile fracture treated in our clinic between January 1990 and January 2009. Patient age, etiology of each fracture, history, physical examination results, radiologic findings, type of treatment, and postoperative complications were recorded. In 5 cases cavernosography was performed and in 8 cases retrograde urethrography. RESULTS The most common etiologies of penile fracture were coitus and manually bending the penis for detumescence. Diagnoses were made based on history and physical examination in 102 patients and cavernosography in 5 patients. In order to evaluate urethral injury in 8 cases, retrograde urethrography was performed. Rupture was repaired surgically in 101 patients, but 6 patients were treated conservatively. Among the 6 conservatively treated patients, 3 developed penile curvature 6 months post-treatment; no complications occurred in the surgically treated patients. CONCLUSION Cavernosography should be performed only when history and physical examination are insufficient for diagnosis, and retrograde urethrography should be performed when urethral injury is suspected. In order to prevent the development of penile curvature and to ensure rapid recovery, early surgical repair is advised.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/tjtes.2011.93763
dc.identifier.endpage60en_US
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21341136
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79251568348
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage57en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid112013
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2011.93763
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/112013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/20176
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000286638200011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCavernosographyen_US
dc.subjectConservative Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectPenile Fractureen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Treatmenten_US
dc.titleThe diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experienceen_US
dc.titleThe diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experience
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu