Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of radiolucent renal stones in children: is it different opaque stone treatment?
dc.contributor.author | Adanur, Senol | |
dc.contributor.author | Ziypak, Tevfik | |
dc.contributor.author | Sancaktutar, Ahmet Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Tepeler, Abdulkadir | |
dc.contributor.author | Resorlu, Berkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Soylemez, Haluk | |
dc.contributor.author | Daggulli, Mansur | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-24T15:59:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-24T15:59:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), stone-free rates, and related complications in children with radiolucent renal stones. A total of 56 patients aged < 16 years from four institutions were enrolled in our study. Asymptomatic, clinically insignificant residual fragments measuring < 4 mm or a complete stone-free status was accepted as the criterion for clinical success. Complications were evaluated according to the modified Clavien classification. The mean age of the patients was 7.8 +/- A 4.5 years. The mean stone size was calculated as 24.07 +/- A 10.4 mm. The median operative and fluoroscopy times were 53.2 min (15-170 min) and 172.4 s (5-520 s), respectively. The success rate after PNL monotherapy was 87.4 %; the total success rate with shock wave lithotripsy used as an auxillary treatment method was detected as 94.6 %. The total complication rate was 19.6 % (11 patients). No adjacent organ injury was observed. All of the complications that occurred were minor according to the Clavien classification (Clavien Grades I-II). PNL can be applied to radiolucent pediatric renal stones in children with similar success, and complication rates as noted for radiopaque stones. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00240-013-0610-7 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 86 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2194-7228 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2194-7236 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24136423 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84896374448 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 81 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0610-7 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/14295 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 42 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000330624900011 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Urolithiasis | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Children | en_US |
dc.subject | Radiolucent Stone | en_US |
dc.subject | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy | en_US |
dc.title | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of radiolucent renal stones in children: is it different opaque stone treatment? | en_US |
dc.title | Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of radiolucent renal stones in children: is it different opaque stone treatment? | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |