Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Fluoride Release of Seven Different Glass-Ionomer-Based Restorative Materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSagmak, Savas
dc.contributor.authorBahsi, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Nida
dc.contributor.authorSatici, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:20:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:20:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate one high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (EQUIA/GC), two resin-modified glass ionomers (Fuji II LC/GC, Photac Fil Quick Aplicap/3M Oral Care), two traditional glass ionomers (Ketac Molar Easymix/3M, Fuji II/GC), and two compomers (Freedom/SDI, Dyract XP/Dentsply Sirona) through a comparison of fluoride release and antimicrobial effects. Materials and Methods: A total of 210 samples were prepared, as 10 for each of the 7 materials for fluoride release and 20 for each material for the antimicrobial effect tests. To measure fluoride release, 5 ml distilled water and 5 ml TISAB II were added to the samples, which were then incubated at 37 degrees C. The fluoride levels of the material were measured using the selective ion electrode on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28. To compare the antimicrobial effects, 20 samples were divided in two groups and implanted in culture media containing Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophylus. Measurements were taken on days 2, 4 and 6. The diameter of the inhibition zone was recorded in millimetre (mm). Results: All the materials released fluoride and the difference between them was determined to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). The antimicrobial effect values of the materials against S. mutans and L. acidophylus were evaluated and statistically significant difference was determined between the materials on all the measurement days. Conclusions: All the materials were observed to release fluoride. With the exception of the compomers, all the other materials showed an antimicrobial effect against S. mutans and L. acidophylus.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDicle University Scientific Research Projects Coordination [DIS.17.016]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Dicle University Scientific Research Projects Coordination (Project Number: DIS.17.016).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.ohpd.a44140
dc.identifier.endpage527en_US
dc.identifier.issn1602-1622
dc.identifier.issn1757-9996
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32515423
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85086346869
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage521en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a44140
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/19231
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000546070900018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Health & Preventive Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFluorideen_US
dc.subjectGlass Ionomeren_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobialen_US
dc.subjectS. Mutansen_US
dc.subjectL. Acidophylusen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Fluoride Release of Seven Different Glass-Ionomer-Based Restorative Materialsen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Fluoride Release of Seven Different Glass-Ionomer-Based Restorative Materials
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu