Radical vs conservative surgery for hydatid liver cysts: Experience from single center

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Sami
dc.contributor.authorSenol, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorSezgin, Arsenal
dc.contributor.authorCakabay, Bahri
dc.contributor.authorDursun, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSatici, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:20:57Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:20:57Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of radical and conservative surgical interventions for liver hydatid disease. METHODS: The study comprised 59 patients in two groups who had undergone radical and conservative surgical procedures for liver hydatid disease in our department between 2004 and 2009. Preoperative diagnostic tools, medical treatments, demographic and clinical characteristics, postoperative follow-up, and recurrence were compared in both groups. RESULTS: This non-randomized retrospective study included 59 patients who had undergone liver hydatid disease surgery. The radical technique was used in 18 patients (mean age: 42.1 +/- 13.5 years, seven male, 11 female), and the conservative technique was used in 41 patients (mean age: 43.5 +/- 13.9 years, 17 male, 24 female). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 58 mo. Although operative time was significantly shorter in the conservative group (P < 0.001), recurrence was significantly reduced in the radical group (P = 0.045). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of hospitalization duration, cyst count and size, location, postoperative complications, scolicidal solution usage, or follow-up duration between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The more effective method for preventing postoperative recurrence is radical surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for bile leakage in the early postoperative period may decrease the requirement for repeat surgery. (C) 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.953
dc.identifier.endpage959en_US
dc.identifier.issn1007-9327
dc.identifier.issn2219-2840
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20180233
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77649259155
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage953en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.953
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/19312
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000275156900006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBaishideng Publishing Group Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Gastroenterology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEchinococcosisen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographyen_US
dc.subjectDigestive System Surgeryen_US
dc.titleRadical vs conservative surgery for hydatid liver cysts: Experience from single centeren_US
dc.titleRadical vs conservative surgery for hydatid liver cysts: Experience from single center
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu