Docetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil Compared With Modified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil As First-Line Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Single Institution

dc.contributor.authorInal, A.
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorKucukoner, M.
dc.contributor.authorIsikdogan, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:24:18Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:24:18Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractGastric cancer is the second most common among cancer-related deaths in the world. Systemic chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer has limited impact on overall survival. We performed a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and side effects of Docetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil (DCF) versus Modified-Dose Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil (mDCF) in the metastatic gastric cancer with first-line chemotherapy treated patients. Retrospectively were reviewed 107 locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients who were treated DCF or mDCF as first-line treatment from June 2007 to August 2011 in Dicle University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology. The DCF protocol included 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel and cisplatin on day 1 and 750 mg/m2/day 5-FU infusion for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks. The mDCF protocol included 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel and cisplatin on day 1 and 600 mg/m(2) 5-Fluorouracil continuous infusion per day on days 1-5, every 3 weeks. Patients were treated using DCF arm 85 (M: 56, F: 29), the mDCF arm 22 (M: 13, F: 9) After treatment toxicities were: Grade III-IV neutropenia (48.2% vs 13.6% p=0.003), anemia (21.2% vs 4.5% p=0.06), nausea (44.7% vs 13.6% p=0.008) and vomiting (31.8% vs 4.5%, p=0.01) was higher in the DCF arm. Other toxicities profile was similar in both groups (p>0.05). The rate of response was similar in both arm. Among patients with the DCF and mDCF arm rate complete response (10.3% vs 6.7%, p>0.05), partial response (35.3% vs 40.0%, p>0.05), stable disease (32.4% vs 33.3%, p>0.05), progressive disease (22.1% vs 20.0%, p>0.05) and overal response (45.6% vs 46.7%, p>0.05) did not have a statistically difference (p>0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were more favorable in the DCF arm than mDCF arm, but the difference was not significant statistically (9.9 vs 8.6, 7.4 vs 6.5 p>0.05) In conclusion, the response rate, median PFS and median OS are similar in both arms, while the mDCF regimen are more favorable than the DCF for toxicity profile regimen in advanced gastric cancer patients who were undergoing first-line palliative treatment. Therefore, a prospective and larger clinical trials are needed.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4149/neo_2012_030
dc.identifier.endpage236en_US
dc.identifier.issn0028-2685
dc.identifier.issn1338-4317
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22248282
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84861540507
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage233en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2012_030
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/19598
dc.identifier.volume59en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000301083700015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAepress Sroen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNeoplasma
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdvanced Gastric Canceren_US
dc.subjectDocetaxelen_US
dc.subjectCisplatinen_US
dc.subjectFluorouracilen_US
dc.titleDocetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil Compared With Modified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil As First-Line Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Single Institutionen_US
dc.titleDocetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil Compared With Modified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil As First-Line Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Single Institution
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar