Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and labumat-urised with manual microscopy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Elif
dc.contributor.authorEkinci, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorEvliyaoğlu, Osman
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:59:25Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Tıbbi Biyokimya Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recent technical developments have focused on the full automation of urinalyses, however the manual microscopic analysis of urine sediment is considered the reference method. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of the LabUMat-UriSed and the H800-FUS100 with manual microscopy, and with each other. Methods: The urine sediments of 332 urine samples were examined by these two devices (LabUMat-UriSed, H800-FUS100) and manual microscopy. Results: The reproducibility of the analyzers, UriSed and Fus100 (4.1-28.5% and 4.7-21.2%, respectively), was better than that with manual microscopy (8.5-33.3%). The UriSed was more sensitive for leukocytes (82%), while the Fus-100 was more sensitive for erythrocyte cell counting (73%). There were moderate correlations between manual microscopy and the two devices, UriSed and Fus100, for erythrocyte (r = 0.496 and 0.498, respectively) and leukocyte (r = 0.597 and 0.599, respectively) cell counting however the correlation between the two devices was much better for erythrocyte (r = 0.643) and for leukocyte (r = 0.767) cell counting. Conclusion: It can be concluded that these two devices showed similar performances. They were time-saving and standardized techniques, especially for reducing preanalytical errors such as the study time, centrifugation, and specimen volume for sedimentary analysis; however, the automated systems are still inadequate for classifying the cells that are present in pathological urine specimens. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citationYüksel, H., Kılıç, E., Ekinci, A. ve Evliyaoğlu, O. (2013). Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and labumat-urised with manual microscopy. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 27(4), 312-316.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jcla.21604
dc.identifier.endpage316en_US
dc.identifier.issn0887-8013
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23852791
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84880380805
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage312en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21604
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14059
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.21604
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000321743300012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutomated urine analysisen_US
dc.subjectFus100en_US
dc.subjectManual urine sediment analysisen_US
dc.subjectUriseden_US
dc.titleComparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and labumat-urised with manual microscopyen_US
dc.titleComparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and labumat-urised with manual microscopy
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Comparison of Fully Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers H800-FUS100 and Labumat-Urised with Manual Microscopy.pdf
Boyut:
69.27 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu