Initial experience of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi in 140 renal units

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Namik Kemal
dc.contributor.authorTepeler, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorBuldu, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorAtis, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorBodakci, Mehmet Nuri
dc.contributor.authorSancaktutar, Ahmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorSilay, Mesrur Selcuk
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:59:53Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:59:53Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and reliability of the micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) method for the management of kidney stones. We performed a retrospective analysis of 136 patients (140 renal units) who underwent micro-PNL for renal stones between September 2011 and February 2013 in four referral hospitals in Turkey. The selection of treatment modality was primarily based on factors such as stone size and location. In this study, we analyzed patient- and procedure-related factors. The mean age of patients in this study was 28.7 +/- A 20.6 (1-69) years, and the mean stone size was 15.1 +/- A 5.15 (6-32) mm. Conversion to mini-PNL was required in 12 patients. All interventions were performed with the patient in the prone position, except for the 3-year-old patient with the pelvic kidney who was placed in the supine position. The mean hospital stay was 1.76 +/- A 0.65 (1-4) days, and the mean drop in the hemoglobin level was 0.87 +/- A 0.84 (0-4.1) mg/dL. One of our patients required transfusion. Ureteral J stent was implanted in nine (6.43 %) patients because of residual stones. Seven (6.43 %) patients complained of postoperative renal colic which was managed conservatively. Abdominal distension related to extravasation of the irrigation fluid was observed in three patients (2.19 %). There were no other postoperative complications. An overall success rate of 82.14 % was achieved. Micro-PNL can be effectively and safely used for small and moderate kidney stones resistant to shock wave lithotripsy or as an alternative to other minimally invasive treatment methods.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-013-0631-2
dc.identifier.endpage164en_US
dc.identifier.issn2194-7228
dc.identifier.issn2194-7236
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24337646
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84899488341
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0631-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14296
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000333213300012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrolithiasis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMicro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectKidney Stoneen_US
dc.subjectTreatmenten_US
dc.subjectEfficacyen_US
dc.subjectSafetyen_US
dc.titleInitial experience of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi in 140 renal unitsen_US
dc.titleInitial experience of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi in 140 renal units
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu