Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEnhos, Sukru
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Tancan
dc.contributor.authorYagci, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorVeli, Ilknur
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Faruk Izzet
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Torun
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:18:46Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:18:46Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To test the null hypothesis that the presence of alveolar defects (dehiscence and fenestration) was not different among patients with different vertical growth patterns. Materials and Methods: A total of 1872 teeth in 26 hyper-divergent (mean age: 24.4 +/- 4.8 years), 27 hypo-divergent (mean age: 25.1 +/- 4.5 years), and 25 normo-divergent (mean age: 23.6 +/- 4.1 years) patients with no previous orthodontic treatment were evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Axial and cross-sectional views were evaluated with regard to whether dehiscence and/or fenestration on buccal and lingual surfaces existed or not. For statistical analysis, the Pearson chi-square test was used at a P < .05 significance level. Results: According to the statistical analysis, the hypo-divergent group (6.56%) had lower dehiscence prevalence than the hyper-divergent (8.35%) and normo-divergent (8.18%) groups (P = .004). Higher prevalences of dehiscence and fenestration were found on buccal sides in all vertical growth patterns. While fenestration was a common finding for the maxillary alveolar region, dehiscence was a common finding in the mandible in all groups. Conclusion: The null hypothesis was rejected. Although the prevalence of fenestrations was not different, significant differences for dehiscences were found in patients with different vertical growth patterns. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:868-874.)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/111211-702.1
dc.identifier.endpage874en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22356702
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84866499092
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage868en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/111211-702.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/18899
dc.identifier.volume82en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000308388700016
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontist
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectFenestrationen_US
dc.subjectDehiscenceen_US
dc.titleDehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.titleDehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu