Comparison of the effects of inhalation, epidural, spinal, and combined anesthesia techniques on rat cremaster muscle flap microcirculation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKulahçı, Yalçın
dc.contributor.authorZor, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorŞen, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorAçıkel, Cengiz Han
dc.contributor.authorDeveci, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorTüregün, Murat
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6836-2732
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5851-0711
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5699-4305
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:59:29Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:59:29Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This experimental study was designed to investigate and compare the effects of different anesthesia techniques on rat cremaster muscle flap microcirculation. Methods: Fifty male Sprague-Dawley rats (130-150 g body weight) were divided into five experimental groups containing ten animals each. Group I, group II, and group III were designated as inhalation, epidural, and spinal anesthesia groups, respectively. Group IV was designated as a combination group for inhalation and epidural anesthesia. Group V was a combination group of inhalation and spinal anesthesia. Results: Group III and group V showed significant increases in the number of rolling and sticking leucocytes and in RBC volume (peripheral stasis) when compared with group I. Blood flow and velocity significantly increased without peripheral stasis in groups II and IV when compared with group I. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the numbers of rolling, sticking, and transmigrating leucocytes or in functional capillary perfusion, group IV had better flow hemodynamics in the peripheral microcirculation when compared with group I. Conclusions: The inhalation and epidural anesthesia combination was determined to be the ideal anesthesia technique for improved peripheral microcirculation. Spinal anesthesia, either separately or in combination with inhalation anesthesia, has adverse effects on microcirculation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBozkurt, M., Kulahçı, Y., Zor, F., Şen, H., Açıkel, C. H., Deveci, M. ve diğerleri. (2010). Comparison of the effects of inhalation, epidural, spinal, and combined anesthesia techniques on rat cremaster muscle flap microcirculation. Microsurgery, 30(1), 55-60.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/micr.20719
dc.identifier.endpage60en_US
dc.identifier.issn0738-1085
dc.identifier.issn1098-2752
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19967761
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-74549122457
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage55en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20719
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14096
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.20719
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000273600700010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorBozkurt, Mehmet
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMicrosurgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword]en_US
dc.titleComparison of the effects of inhalation, epidural, spinal, and combined anesthesia techniques on rat cremaster muscle flap microcirculationen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effects of inhalation, epidural, spinal, and combined anesthesia techniques on rat cremaster muscle flap microcirculation
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Comparison of the effects of inhalation, epidural, spinal, and combined anesthesia techniques on rat cremaster muscle flap microcirculation.pdf
Boyut:
221.08 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu