Effect of Different Esthetic Post-Core Materials on Color of Direct-Composite Restorations: A Preliminary Clinical Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAyna, Buket
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Berivan D.
dc.contributor.authorIzol, Bozan S.
dc.contributor.authorAyna, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorTacir, Ibrahim Halil
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:15:08Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of 2 different esthetic post materials on the final color of direct-composite restorations by using a digital technique under in vivo conditions. Material/Methods: We included 22 pulpless incisor teeth treated with conventionally cemented zirconia (n=11) and polyethylene fiber (n=11) posts in the study. Teeth were restored with a hybrid resin. The color of direct-composite restorations and contralateral control teeth was measured using a digital technique. The Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage, or CIE, L*a*b* and RGB color systems were investigated. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for the CIE L*a*b* values. Color differences (DE) for the average L*,a*,and b* color parameters between every pair of groups were calculated (P>.05). Results: Significant differences were not found in the color difference luminosity (lum), R, G, B, and L* a* b* values between the zircon-rich glass fiber post (Z) and contralateral control teeth (Cz) (P>.05) and between the polyethylene fiber post (P) and contralateral control teeth (Cp) (P>.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the color a* values of the polyethylene fiber post (P) and contralateral control teeth (Cp) (p<0.05). Color differences (DE) between the zircon-rich glass fiber post (Z) and contralateral control teeth, and the polyethylene fiber post (P) and contralateral teeth were not statistically significant (P>.05). Conclusions: Definitive restorations were equally affected by the 2 materials. Both materials can be used reliably in clinical practice. However, further research that focuses on the effect of intraoral conditions is needed.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/MSM.908606
dc.identifier.endpage4100en_US
dc.identifier.issn1643-3750
dc.identifier.pmid29906270
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048702836
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage4091en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908606
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/18346
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000436361400003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInt Scientific Literature, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Science Monitor
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectColoren_US
dc.subjectPolyethyleneen_US
dc.subjectZirconiumen_US
dc.titleEffect of Different Esthetic Post-Core Materials on Color of Direct-Composite Restorations: A Preliminary Clinical Studyen_US
dc.titleEffect of Different Esthetic Post-Core Materials on Color of Direct-Composite Restorations: A Preliminary Clinical Study
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu