Effects of Different Cavity Designs on Fracture Load of Fiber-reinforced Adhesive Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Anterior Region

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAktas, Guliz
dc.contributor.authorBasara, Emine Goncu
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorUctasli, Sadullah
dc.contributor.authorVallittu, Pekka K.
dc.contributor.authorLassila, Lippor V. J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:20:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:20:45Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the fracture strength of inlay-retained, surface-retained, and cantilevered fiber-reinforced adhesively fixed dental prostheses (FRA-FDPs) in the anterior region. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two sound human right central incisors and canines were divided into four groups. Test groups were as follows: group 1, both teeth had deep cavity preparation; group 2, both teeth had shallow cavity preparation; group 3, only the canine teeth had deep cavity preparation; group 4, no preparation was made on the abutment teeth. Lateral pontics were restored with FRA-FDPs. All restorations were subjected to fracture loading from the lateral pontic. The restorations were tested in a universal testing machine (LRX Material Testing Machine) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analyses. Fracture modes were examined visually. Results: The highest (667.3 +/- 90.4 N) and the lowest (409.3 +/- 158.1 N) debonding values were found for groups 4 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Different preparation designs (inlay-retained, surface-retained) had no significant effect on fracture strength of FRA-FDPs in the anterior region. However, a cantilever design exhibited significantly lower fracture strength. Delamination of the veneering composite was observed as the primary failure type after fracture tests.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a28505
dc.identifier.endpage135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23534008
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84879511685
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28505
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/19227
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000319168700005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFracture Strengthen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive Fdpsen_US
dc.subjectFiber-Reinforced Compositesen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Cavity Designs on Fracture Load of Fiber-reinforced Adhesive Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Anterior Regionen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Cavity Designs on Fracture Load of Fiber-reinforced Adhesive Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Anterior Region
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu