Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorVeli, Ilknur
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Tancan
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Asli
dc.contributor.authorKaradede, Irfan
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:59:43Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:59:43Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractCortical bone thickness plays an important role in the primary stability of miniscrews. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the buccal cortical bone thickness in adolescent subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). We examined the CBCT images of 75 patients (30 males, 45 females; mean age 16.5 years; range 15.3-17.7 years) in the present study. High-, average- and low-angle subgroups were generated according to SN-GoMe angle. On volumetric images, we measured the buccal cortical bone thickness from canine to the second molar teeth at heights of 5, 7 and 9 mm from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). For statistical evaluation, the Wilcoxon signed rank, Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey HSD tests were applied at the p < 0.05 level. Buccal cortical bone was thickest in the low-angle group. We observed statistically significant differences in the maxilla between the high- and low-angle groups at all levels. In the mandible, we noted statistically significant differences between high-angle and low-angle groups in the canine-first premolar regions at heights of 5 and 7 mm, and in the second premolar-first molar region at 7 mm height from CEJ. Significant differences were also present between the first and second premolars at heights of 7 and 9 mm. Average cortical bone thickness ranged from 1.10-1.37 mm in the maxilla and 1.20-3.28 mm in the mandible for all groups. Buccal cortical bone thickness in adolescents varied in different vertical skeletal patterns and was greater in the mandible than in the maxilla, with the distance increasing from the CEJ to the apex. As the buccal cortical bone is thinner in high-angle patients, patient-specific measures should be taken when performing miniscrew treatment.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00056-014-0235-7
dc.identifier.endpage429en_US
dc.identifier.issn1434-5293
dc.identifier.issn1615-6714
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25344123
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84919882095
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage417en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0235-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14225
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000344529900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUrban & Vogelen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCortical Bone Thicknessen_US
dc.subjectMiniscrewen_US
dc.subjectCone Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectVertical Dimensionen_US
dc.titleBuccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patternsen_US
dc.titleBuccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu