Does aging affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBuldu, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorTepeler, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorKaratag, Tuna
dc.contributor.authorBodakci, Mehmet Nuri
dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Namik Kemal
dc.contributor.authorPenbegül, Necmettin
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Tolga
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:59:53Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:59:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTo investigate whether aging affects surgical outcomes by comparing the results of two patient groups undergoing PNL: those over 60 and those under 60. A retrospective screen was made for patients undergoing conventional PNL surgery for renal stones performed in two separate centers between 2010 and 2013. 520 patients included were classified into age groups: patients aged 18-59 comprised Group-1 and those aged over 60 comprised Group-2. Those between 60-69 years (sexagenarian) were assigned to Group-2a; 70-79 years (septuagenarian) to Group-2b; and 80-89 years (octogenarian) to Group-2c. Patients' demographic characteristics (accompanying comorbidities, ASA scores, body mass indices and stone size) and perioperative values (duration of surgery and hospital stay, success and complication rates) were compared between the groups. Mean stone size was similar in groups (30.1 +/- 15.5 vs. 31.5 +/- 15.4 mm, p = 0.379). The mean ASA value for the patients in Group-1 was 1.61; significantly lower than that in the other groups (p = 0.000). The level of accompanying comorbidities in Group-1 was significantly lower than that of the other groups (p = 0.000). The mean duration of surgery, postoperative hematocrit drop, complication and success rate were statistically similar in Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.860, p = 0.430, p = 0.7, and p = 0.66, respectively). The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the patients in Group-1 compared to those in Group-2 (p = 0.008). In experienced hands, PNL can be safely and reliably performed in the treatment of renal stones in elderly patients.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-014-0742-4
dc.identifier.endpage187en_US
dc.identifier.issn2194-7228
dc.identifier.issn2194-7236
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25395249
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84925493692
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage183en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0742-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14299
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000351587200012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrolithiasis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectKidney Stoneen_US
dc.subjectAgingen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectOutcomeen_US
dc.titleDoes aging affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?en_US
dc.titleDoes aging affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu