The features of infectious diseases departments and anti-infective practices in France and Turkey: a cross-sectional study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErdem, H.
dc.contributor.authorStahl, J. P.
dc.contributor.authorInan, A.
dc.contributor.authorKilic, S.
dc.contributor.authorAkova, M.
dc.contributor.authorRioux, C.
dc.contributor.authorPierre, I.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:02:01Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:02:01Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the infectious diseases (ID) wards of tertiary hospitals in France and Turkey for technical capacity, infection control, characteristics of patients, infections, infecting organisms, and therapeutic approaches. This cross-sectional study was carried out on a single day on one of the weekdays of June 17-21, 2013. Overall, 36 ID departments from Turkey (n = 21) and France (n = 15) were involved. On the study day, 273 patients were hospitalized in Turkish and 324 patients were followed in French ID departments. The numbers of patients and beds in the hospitals, and presence of an intensive care unit (ICU) room in the ID ward was not different in both France and Turkey. Bed occupancy in the ID ward, single rooms, and negative pressure rooms were significantly higher in France. The presence of a laboratory inside the ID ward was more common in Turkish ID wards. The configuration of infection control committees, and their qualifications and surveillance types were quite similar in both countries. Although differences existed based on epidemiology, the distribution of infections were uniform on both sides. In Turkey, anti-Gram-positive agents, carbapenems, and tigecycline, and in France, cephalosporins, penicillins, aminoglycosides, and metronidazole were more frequently preferred. Enteric Gram-negatives and hepatitis B and C were more frequent in Turkey, while human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and streptococci were more common in France (p < 0.05 for all significances). Various differences and similarities existed in France and Turkey in the ID wards. However, the current scene is that ID are managed with high standards in both countries.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10096-014-2116-9
dc.identifier.endpage1599en_US
dc.identifier.issn0934-9723
dc.identifier.issn1435-4373
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24789652
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84906062372
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1591en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2116-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14576
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000340538700017
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword]en_US
dc.titleThe features of infectious diseases departments and anti-infective practices in France and Turkey: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.titleThe features of infectious diseases departments and anti-infective practices in France and Turkey: a cross-sectional study
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu