Differences in evaluation between geriatric and adult patients requiring pulmonary consultation

dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz, Gulistan
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Melike
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Halide
dc.contributor.authorYesil, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorDegerli, Semih
dc.contributor.authorYenibertiz, Derya
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:00:14Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of the study was to investigate the effects of age in pulmonary consultation and to evaluate differences between geriatric and adult patients. Consultation referrals to the clinic of chest diseases for patients from emergency, inpatient and outpatient clinics of a tertiary care general hospital between December 2010 and April 2011 were examined retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, namely those aged 65 years and over (geriatric patients) and those under the age of 65 years (adults). Out of 272 patients 135 (49.6 %) were geriatric patients and 137 (50.4 %) were adult patients. The mean age of the geriatric patients and adults was 75.6 +/- 7.1 years and 49.7 +/- 11.8 years, respectively. While the geriatric patients showed a significantly higher presence of pathologies in chest radiography, respiratory complaints and concomitant diseases compared to the adult group, the respiratory function test results were lower. The complaint of shortness of breath was higher in the geriatric group compared to the adult group (71 % in geriatric patients and 59.1 % in adults). The most common diagnosis was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 37 %) in the geriatric patients and asthma (27.7 %) in the adult patients. As to the results of consultations, treatment-oriented recommendations were given for 63 (46.6 %) geriatric patients and approval for operation was given for 75 (54.7 %) adult patients. Consultants should take the age of patients into consideration during evaluation in order to achieve the most appropriate treatment plan for these patients and reduce the potential postoperative complications to a minimum.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00391-015-0863-6
dc.identifier.endpage645en_US
dc.identifier.issn0948-6704
dc.identifier.issn1435-1269
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25743044
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84943455613
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage641en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-015-0863-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14412
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000362584100011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofZeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGeriatricen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary Consultationen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory Function Testen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studyen_US
dc.subjectChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseaseen_US
dc.titleDifferences in evaluation between geriatric and adult patients requiring pulmonary consultationen_US
dc.titleDifferences in evaluation between geriatric and adult patients requiring pulmonary consultation
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar