Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Torun
dc.contributor.authorBasaran, Guevenc
dc.contributor.authorKama, Jalen Devecioglu
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:10:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:10:45Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: After fixed appliance treatment, one concern is to restore the enamel surface as closely to its original state as possible. A variety of cleanup processes are available, but all are time-consuming and carry some risk of enamel damage. The purpose of this study was to examine tooth surfaces restored with different cleanup protocols. Methods: Ninety-nine premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were used. The 2 materials tested were Sof-Lex disks (3 M ESPE AG, Seefeld, Germany) and fiberglass burs (Stain Buster, Carbotech, Ganges, France). These were used alone and in combination with high-and low-speed handpieces, with which they were also compared. Eight groups were ultimately tested. All groups were compared with intact enamel, which served as the control group. From each group, 10 samples were examined with profilometry and 1 with scanning electron microscopy. Adhesive remnant index scores were recorded to ensure equal distributions for the groups. The time required for the cleanup processes and profilometry test results were also recorded. Results: The fastest procedure was performed with high-speed handpieces, followed by lowspeed handpieces. Sof-Lex disks and fiberglass burs required more time than carbide burs but did not result in significantly longer times for the cleanup procedure when combined with tungsten carbide-driven low-or high-speed handpieces or when used alone with low-speed handpieces. Although Sof-Lex disks were the most successful for restoring the enamel, it was not necessary to restore the enamel to its original surface condition. Generally, all enamel surface-roughness parameters were increased when compared with the values of intact enamel. The average roughness and maximum roughness depth measurements with Sof-Lex disks were statistically similar to measurements of intact enamel. Conclusions: No cleanup procedure used in this study restored the enamel to its original roughness. The most successful was Sof-Lex disks, which restored the enamel closer to its original roughness. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137:368-74)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.025
dc.identifier.endpage374en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20197174
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77249105405
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage368en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/15086
dc.identifier.volume137en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000275100700023
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword]en_US
dc.titleSurface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatmenten_US
dc.titleSurface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu