Magnetic Compression Ostomy as New Cystostomy Technique in the Rat: Magnacystostomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUygun, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorOkur, Mehmet Hanifi
dc.contributor.authorCimen, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Ozben
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Hayrettin
dc.contributor.authorOtcu, Selcuk
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:18:34Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE To report the first creation of magnetic compression cystostomy (magnacystostomy) using an easy and simple new technique in rats. Magnetic compression anastomoses (magnamosis) have been previously described for gastrointestinal, biliary, urinary, and vascular anastomoses. METHODS Female rats were randomized into 2 groups (n = 10 each): a magnetic cystostomy group and a formal surgical cystostomy group as the control group. In the magnetic cystostomy group, a very small cylindrical magnet was inserted into the bladder. The external magnetic ball was placed subcutaneously into the suprapubic region, and the 2 magnets were coupled together strongly. On postoperative day 20 in the magnetic cystostomy group and day 10 in the surgical cystostomy group, the rats were killed, and the cystostomies were evaluated macroscopically, histopathologically, and by mechanical burst testing. RESULTS In the surgical cystostomy group, 3 rats died. In the remaining rats, no evidence of complications was observed. However, mild adhesion in 1 rat in the magnetic cystostomy group and moderate adhesions in all the rats in the surgical cystostomy group were observed. No significant difference was found in burst pressure between the 2 groups (mean 162 mm Hg in the magnetic cystostomy group [n = 6] and 185 mm Hg in the surgical cystostomy [n = 5] group). However, the procedure time between the magnetic cystostomy group (7.70 +/- 1.64 minutes) and surgical cystostomy group (18.50 +/- 2.01 minutes) was significantly different (P < .001). CONCLUSION Magnacystostomy is easy and safe in the rat model and could be useful for some suprapubic cystostomy procedures in humans. UROLOGY 79: 738-742, 2012. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.048
dc.identifier.endpage742en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-4295
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22386431en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84857831152en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage738en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.048
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/16178
dc.identifier.volume79en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000301154400069
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword]en_US
dc.titleMagnetic Compression Ostomy as New Cystostomy Technique in the Rat: Magnacystostomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu