Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy: 16-year Experience of a Medical Hospital

dc.contributor.authorYalinkaya, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGuzel, Ali Irfan
dc.contributor.authorKangal, Kadir
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:19:01Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:19:01Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the outcomes and indications of emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) as a life-saving procedure. Methods: We analyzed a series of 140 cases of EPH, between January 1993 and December 2008 in our clinic, retrospectively. The data were collected from the patients' files. The incidence, demographic characteristics, risk factors, indications and outcomes of hysterectomy, peripartum complications, the operation types, maternal morbidity and mortality and fetal mortality were evaluated. Results: A total of 26,015 of women were delivered. The incidence of EPH was 5.38 per 1,000 deliveries. The mean age was 34.19 +/- 6.04 years (range, 21-49 years), gravidity was 6.84 +/- 3.38 (1-17) and parity was 5.58 +/- 3.04 (0-15). Of the 140 cases, 90 were delivered by cesarean section [29 (20.71%) of these had had a previous cesarean section] and 50 were vaginally delivered. One hundred and five cases had subtotal hysterectomy and 35 had total abdominal hysterectomy. The most common indications for EPH were uterine atony followed by uterine rupture and abnormal placentation. Mean operation time was 142.23 +/- 43.70 minutes. The average blood transfusion was 4.79 +/- 3.36 (1-14) units. Relaparotomy was performed in 23 cases. Maternal mortality was seen in 13 cases. Seventy-nine of the cases delivered at an outside center and were referred to our clinic for the intensive care unit. Sixty-one of the cases delivered at our clinic and 31 had stillbirths. Conclusion: This study suggests that the most common indications for EPH are uterine atony, uterine rupture and abnormal placentation. This is probably due to the advanced age of pregnancies and multiparity in our region. Therefore, we believe that the risk of EPH may be decreased with appropriate and closer prenatal care as well as education of the pregnant women. [J Chin Med Assoc 2010;73(7):360-363]en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70078-2
dc.identifier.endpage363en_US
dc.identifier.issn1726-4901
dc.identifier.issn1728-7731
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20688301
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955233858
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage360en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70078-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/16369
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000280674000004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of The Chinese Medical Association
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEmergenciesen_US
dc.subjectHysterectomyen_US
dc.subjectIndicationsen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectPeripartumen_US
dc.titleEmergency Peripartum Hysterectomy: 16-year Experience of a Medical Hospitalen_US
dc.titleEmergency Peripartum Hysterectomy: 16-year Experience of a Medical Hospital
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar