Comparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cements

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBagheri, Rafat
dc.contributor.authorMese, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, Michael F.
dc.contributor.authorTyas, Martin J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:15:03Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:15:03Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To measure the shear punch strength of eight resin-containing luting cements before and after immersion in acidic solution and ethanol at different temperatures (37 degrees C and 60 degrees C). Method: Specimens were prepared from six resin luting cements; Set (SDI), Panavia F (Kuraray), RelyX Veneer (3M/ESPE), Varioloinkll (Ivoclar), Maxcem (Kerr), Nexus2 (Kerr) and two Resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (RM-GICs); GC Fuji Plus (GC Corporation), RelyX Luting 2 (3 M/ESPE). For each material a total of 114 disc-shaped specimens were prepared. Six specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24h at 37 degrees C, polished and subjected to baseline measurement for shear punch strength. The remaining 108 specimens were randomly divided into 18 groups of six, and immersed in three solutions; distilled water, 0.01 mol/L lactic acid, and 50% ethanol at 37 degrees C or 60 degrees C, for 1 week, 1 month or 3 months. Specimens were washed, dried and tested for final shear punch strength. Results: Values were material and solution dependent. Values of Nexus 2 and Rely X Veneer are the highest, and Rely X Luting 2 the lowest. Ethanol and lactic acid specimens showed significantly lower values compared with the distilled water specimens. Conclusion: The shear punch strengths of the resin-containing luting cements were affected by time and storage solution. While some of the resin luting cements had significantly higher values compared to that of the RM-GICs, there were no significant differences between the RM-GICs and resin cements such as Panavia F and Set. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMelbourne Dental School, the University of Melbourne; Dicle Universitesi Bilimsel Arastirma Projeleri Koordinatorlugu-Diyarbakir/TURKEY (DUBAP)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported in part by and conducted in the Melbourne Dental School, the University of Melbourne. Dr Mese was supported by a grant from Dicle Universitesi Bilimsel Arastirma Projeleri Koordinatorlugu-Diyarbakir/TURKEY (DUBAP).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.014
dc.identifier.endpage827en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20600555
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77956056287
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage820en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/15616
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000282116800008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectShear Punch Strengthen_US
dc.subjectResin Cementsen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cementsen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cements
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu