Prognostic factors for stereopsis in refractive accommodative esotropia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGuclu, Hande
dc.contributor.authorGurlu, Vuslat Pelitli
dc.contributor.authorOzal, Sadik Altan
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Zeynep Gursel
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:15:09Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:15:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the prognostic factors affecting stereoacuity in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia (RAE) according to the results of long follow- up period. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 70 patients with RAE between the years 1985-2014. Patients were classified into three groups. G-1: Stereoacuity score 40 second/arc. G-2: Stereoacuity score >40 second/arc (50-3000). G-3: No binocular vision. Initiation age of RAE, duration of deviation, refractive error, amblyopia, amblyopia treatment, anisometropia, visual acuity, family history, angle of deviation for distance and near at each group and the prognostic factors affecting stereoacuity were analyzed. Results: The mean initiation age of RAE was 2.7 +/- 1.5 years, the mean age at first visit was 6.4 +/- 4.2 years. The mean follow up time was 7.3 +/- 4.4 years. Seven patients had 40 second/arc, 48 patients had 50 to 3000 second/arc stereoacuity, 15 patients had no binocular vision. Mean deviation for near was statistically higher in group 2 and 3. Visual acuity levels were higher in group 1 and 2 and was statistically significant. Low visual acuity (p=0.001, 0.008), higher angle of deviation at near (p=0.01), increased duration of deviation (p=0.01), presence of amblyopia (p=0.001) and irregularity of amblyopia treatment (p=0.01) were significantly related with poor stereoacuity. Conclusion: According to the prognostic factors low stereoacuity was mostly related with amblyopia as a result the late presentation of the patients in seeking care. Appropriate treatment as full refractive correction and amblyopia treatment during the RAE is important for development of good stereopsis. Also angle of deviation at near and duration of deviation can be a useful predictor for poor stereoacuity levels.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12669/pjms.314.7465
dc.identifier.endpage811en_US
dc.identifier.issn1682-024X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26430408
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84937883180
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage807en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.314.7465
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/18357
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000362237900013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherProfessional Medical Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmblyopiaen_US
dc.subjectRefractive Accommodative Esotropiaen_US
dc.subjectStereopsisen_US
dc.titlePrognostic factors for stereopsis in refractive accommodative esotropiaen_US
dc.titlePrognostic factors for stereopsis in refractive accommodative esotropia
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu