Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-7931-2941 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gündoğan, Cihan | |
dc.contributor.author | Kömek, Halil | |
dc.contributor.author | Can, Canan | |
dc.contributor.author | Yıldırım, Özgen Ahmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaplan, İhsan | |
dc.contributor.author | Erdur, Erkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Poyraz, Kerem | |
dc.contributor.author | Güzel, Yunus | |
dc.contributor.author | Oruç, Zeynep | |
dc.contributor.author | Çakabay, Bahri | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-29T09:42:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-29T09:42:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Medikal Onkoloji Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.description | WOS:000728500900009 | |
dc.description | PMID: 34661379 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivities of Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT and F-18-FDG PET/CT in the primary tumor, and nodal, peritoneal and distant organ metastases of primary and recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma (GAc) with patient and lesion-based comparison. Materials and method Twenty-one patients with histopathologically proven newly diagnosed or recurrent GAc who underwent F-18-FDG and Ga-68-FAPI-04 imaging were included in the study. Both imaging techniques were evaluated visually according to the intensity of organ-based uptake. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) values obtained from primary tumor/relapse and metastatic organs were compared statistically. Results Ga-68-FAPI-04 uptake was positive in all 15 newly diagnosed patients, while two patients among them who had mucinous and signet ring cell carcinoma did not exhibit F-18-FDG uptake. The sensitivity and specificity of Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT in detecting primary gastric were 100%, while the sensitivity and specificity of F-18-FDG were 86.6 and 100%, respectively. Ga-68-FAPI-04 imaging revealed diffuse stomach uptake in seven patients, while F-18-FDG could only show two of them. The sensitivity and specificity of in-patient-based detection of lymph node metastases were 100 and 95.2%, respectively, while these values were 71.4 and 93.7%, respectively, for F-18-FDG. For peritoneal involvement Ga-68-FAPI-04 had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, whereas F-18-FDG had a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT is an imaging modality with the potential of yielding more sensitive and specific findings F-18-FDG PET/CT. This modality may help avoid invasive diagnostic procedures that may be frequently required in GAc. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Gündoğan, C., Kömek, H., Can, C., Yıldırım, Ö.A., Kaplan, İ., Erdur, E. ve diğerleri. (2022). Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 43(1), 64-72. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001489 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 72 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0143-3636 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1473-5628 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34661379 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85121977117 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 64 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/8881 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000728500900009 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.institutionauthor | Oruç, Zeynep | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott William & Wilkins | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Nuclear Medicine Communications | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | F-18-FDG | en_US |
dc.subject | Ga-68-FAPI | en_US |
dc.subject | PET | en_US |
dc.subject | CT | en_US |
dc.subject | Gastric adenocarcinoma | en_US |
dc.subject | Peritoneal metastasis | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |