Efficacy of Pulsed and Continuous Therapeutic Ultrasound in Myofascial Pain Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Study

dc.contributor.authorIlter, Leman
dc.contributor.authorDilek, Banu
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorUlu, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorSariyildiz, Mustafa A.
dc.contributor.authorNas, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorCevik, Remzi
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:08:24Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:08:24Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives This study aimed to compare continuous and pulsed ultrasound therapy with sham ultrasound in terms of pain, severity of muscle spasm, function, depression, and quality of life in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. Design Patients were randomly divided into three groups, including the continuous ultrasound group (3 MHz, 1 W/cm(2), n = 20), the pulsed ultrasound group (3 MHz, 1 W/cm(2), 1:1 ratio, n = 20), and control group (sham, n = 20). The primary outcome measures were severity of pain at rest and during activity (visual analog scale, 0-10 cm). The secondary outcome measures were function (Neck Pain and Disability Scale), depressive mood (Beck Depression Scale), and quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile). All evaluations were performed at baseline, after treatment, and at the 6th and 12th wks. Results All three groups had significant improvements in all of the pain scores, the severity of muscle spasms, function assessments, and certain subparameters of the quality of life scale (P < 0.05). The continuous ultrasound group had significantly greater improvements in pain at rest (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the other parameters (P > 0.05). Conclusions Continuous ultrasound therapy is more efficient in reducing pain at rest for myofascial pain syndrome patients than is sham or pulsed ultrasound therapy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PHM.0000000000000210
dc.identifier.endpage554en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-9115
dc.identifier.issn1537-7385
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25299534
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84931827214
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage547en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000210
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/17331
dc.identifier.volume94en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000356493700006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic Ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectSham Ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectMyofascial Pain Syndromeen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Pulsed and Continuous Therapeutic Ultrasound in Myofascial Pain Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Studyen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Pulsed and Continuous Therapeutic Ultrasound in Myofascial Pain Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Study
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar