Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases
dc.contributor.author | Beyaz, Serbulent Gokhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Tokgoz, Orhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Tufek, Adnan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-24T17:24:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-24T17:24:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Regional anesthesia is usually preferred as caudal block via the epidural space. However, the number of large-scale studies including pediatric caudal blocks is small. The objective of this study was to evaluate complications and side effects of local anesthetics and adjuvant drugs. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective, descriptive study of cases occurring during the period December 2007 to October 2009. METHODS: Of 4815 medical records were screened, 2088 pediatric cases were identified and included in this study. RESULTS: As a local anesthetic, we preferred mostly levobupivacaine in 1669 (79.9%) patients and bupivacaine in 419 (20.1%) patients. As adjuvant drug, we preferred mostly morphine (41 patients), fentanyl (7 patients) and adrenaline (6 patients) in 54 (2.5%) patients. For general anesthesia induction, we preferred mostly propofol (1996 patients, 94.2%); for maintenance, sevoflurane (1773 patients, 84.9%). For airway control, we preferred mostly the ProSeal laryngeal mask (PLMA), in 1008 (48.2%) patients. One thousand six hundred five (76.9%) patients were from outpatient clinics and 483 (23.1%) patients were from inpatient clinics. No permanent complication was encountered after caudal blocks. CONCLUSION: We conclude that caudal epidural blocks are a safe and effective method for subumbilical day-case pediatric surgeries when performed by anesthetists. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4103/0256-4947.84627 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 497 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0256-4947 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1319-9226 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21911987 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-80052903743 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 494 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.84627 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/19518 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000294896700008 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | K Faisal Spec Hosp Res Centre | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Saudi Medicine | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | [No Keyword] | en_US |
dc.title | Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases | en_US |
dc.title | Caudal epidural block in children and infants: retrospective analysis of 2088 cases | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |