In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets using two different laser etching, self etching and acid etching methods

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorHamamci, Nihal
dc.contributor.authorAkkurt, Atilim
dc.contributor.authorBasaran, Guevenc
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:02:02Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:02:02Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the microleakage of brackets bonded by four different enamel etching techniques. Forty freshly extracted human premolars were divided randomly into four equal groups and received the following treatment: group 1, acid etching; group 2, self-etching primer (SEP); group 3, erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser etching; and group 4, erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser etching. After photopolymerization, the teeth were kept in distilled water for 1 month and then subjected to 500 thermal cycles. Then, the specimens were sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 h, sectioned, and examined under a stereomicroscope. In addition, they were scored for marginal microleakage at the adhesive-enamel and bracket-adhesive interfaces from the incisal and gingival margins. Statistical analyses consisted of the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. Microleakage occurred between the adhesive-enamel and bracket-adhesive interfaces in all groups. For the adhesive-enamel surface, a significant difference was observed between group 1 and groups 2 (P = 0.011), 3 (P = 0.002), and 4 (P = 0.000) on the gingival side. Overall, significant differences were observed between group 1 and groups 3 (P = 0.003) and 4 (P = 0.000). In dental bonding procedures, acid etching was found to result in the least microleakage. Since etching with a laser decreases the risk of caries and is time-saving, it may serve as an alternative to acid etching.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-009-0704-1
dc.identifier.endpage816en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.issn1435-604X
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19562404
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77957253830
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage811en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0704-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14586
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000281673600007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofLasers in Medical Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectErbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Er:Yag) Laseren_US
dc.subjectErrbium, Chromium:Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet (Er,Cr:Ysgg) Laseren_US
dc.subjectAcid Etchen_US
dc.subjectSelf Etchen_US
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets using two different laser etching, self etching and acid etching methodsen_US
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets using two different laser etching, self etching and acid etching methods
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu