A comparison of proximal femoral locking plate versus 95-degree angled blade plate in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric fractures

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAzboy, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorGem, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorCakir, Idris Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorTutak, Yilmaz
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:27:58Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:27:58Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to compare the results of the proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP) and the 95-angled blade plate in the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A3 reverse intertrochanteric fractures with fracture line extending to the greater trochanter. Patients and methods: Forty-four patients with reverse intertrochanteric fracture which fracture line extending to the greater trochanter were retrospectively analyzed. Of those, 20 were treated with PFLP (PFLP group) and 24 were treated with ABP (ABP group). The AO/OTA classification was used for the classification of the fractures. Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically for the union at the fracture site and implant-related complications. Hip functions were evaluated with the Harris hip score. Results: The mean time to union was 17 weeks (range 14-28) and 18 weeks (range 16-32) in the PFLP group and ABP group, respectively. Implant failure and/or nonunion was observed in two patients (10%) in the PFLP group and in three patients (12%) in the ABP group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to the Harris hip scores, time to union, need for reoperation due to mechanical problems, and complication rates (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study results show that these two fixation methods seem to produce similar results in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric fractures with greater trochanteric comminution. However, we suggest that ABP still remains as a good choice with less expense in such fractures.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/ehc.2014.04
dc.identifier.endpage20en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-8282
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24650379
dc.identifier.startpage15en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid155014
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2014.04
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/155014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/20275
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000334479400004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Joint Diseases Foundationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectFracture Healingen_US
dc.subjectHip Fractureen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Failureen_US
dc.titleA comparison of proximal femoral locking plate versus 95-degree angled blade plate in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric fracturesen_US
dc.titleA comparison of proximal femoral locking plate versus 95-degree angled blade plate in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric fractures
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu