Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for the Treatment of Kidney Stone Within Pelvic Ectopic Kidney

dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorTepeler, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorSninsky, Brian
dc.contributor.authorOzyuvali, Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorZiypak, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorAtis, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorDaggulli, Mansur
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:18:36Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:18:36Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE To present the outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) and laser lithotripsy for the treatment of calculi within pelvic ectopic kidney (PEK). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 26 patients with calculi in PEK treated with F-URS in 5 referral hospitals between 2010 and 2013. Patient demographics and stone characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, stone size, location, history of shock wave lithotripsy or kidney surgery), and perioperative measures (duration of operation, fluoroscopic imaging, and hospitalization and success and complication rates) were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 26 patients with mean age of 41.1 +/- 15.8 years (7-72 years) were included in the study. The mean stone size was 17.0 +/- 5.1 mm (10-28 mm). The mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were calculated as 52.1 +/- 27.7 minutes (30-120 minutes) and 54.8 +/- 48.9 seconds (10-180 seconds), respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.7 +/- 1.8 days (1-9 days). Treatment was deemed successful in 22 patients (84.6%). Ureteroscopy failed in 4 patients (15.4%) due to impaired passage of fragments (n = 3) or inability to reach the stone secondary to the location in an isolated lower calyx (n = 1). Minor postoperative complications were observed in 5 patients (19.2%; persistent hematuria [n = 1], fever [n = 1], renal colic [n = 2], and urinary tract infection [n = 1]). No severe complications or mortality occurred. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that F-URS is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment modality for small-and medium-sized stones in PEK. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.041
dc.identifier.endpage1289en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-4295
dc.identifier.issn1527-9995
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25288574
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84922411548
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1285en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.041
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/16189
dc.identifier.volume84en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000345580500015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword]en_US
dc.titleFlexible Ureterorenoscopy for the Treatment of Kidney Stone Within Pelvic Ectopic Kidneyen_US
dc.titleFlexible Ureterorenoscopy for the Treatment of Kidney Stone Within Pelvic Ectopic Kidney
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar