Comparison of load-bearing capacities of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite adhesive bridges with different framework designs

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-2684-0131en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5466-7247en_US
dc.contributor.authorTacir, İbrahim H.
dc.contributor.authorDirihan, Roda S.
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Zelal Seyfioğlu
dc.contributor.authorSalman, Gizem Ön
dc.contributor.authorVallittu, Pekka
dc.contributor.authorLassila, Lippo
dc.contributor.authorAyna, Emrah
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-18T05:59:52Z
dc.date.available2024-01-18T05:59:52Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the load-bearing capacities of three-unit direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis with different framework designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular premolar and molar teeth without caries were collected and direct glass fiber-resin fixed FDPs were divided into 6 groups (n=10). Each group was restored via direct technique with different designs. In Group 1, the inlay-retained bridges formed 2 unidirectional FRC frameworks and pontic-reinforced transversal FRC. In Group 2, the inlay-retained bridges were supported by unidirectional lingual and occlusal FRC frameworks. Group 3, had buccal and lingual unidirectional FRC frameworks without the inlay cavities. Group 4 had reinforced inlay cavities and buccal-lingual FRC with unidirectional FRC frameworks. Group 5, had a circular form of fiber reinforcement around cusps in addition to buccal-lingual FRC frameworks. Group 6 had a circular form of fiber reinforcement around cusps with 2 bidirectional FRC frameworks into inlay cavities. All groups were loaded until final fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. RESULTS: Mean values of the groups were determined with ANOVA and Tukey HSD. When all data were evaluated, Group 6 had the highest load-bearing capacities and revealed significant differences from Group 3 and Group 4. Group 6 had the highest strain (p>0.05). When the fracture patterns were investigated, Group 6 had the durability to sustain fracture propagation within the restoration. CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of fiber reinforcement of the restorations alters not only the amount of fiber, but also the design of the restoration with fibers.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTacir, İ. H., Dirihan, R. S., Polat, Z. S., Salman, G. Ö., Vallittu, P., Lassila, L. ve diğerleri. (2018). Comparison of load-bearing capacities of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite adhesive bridges with different framework designs. Medical Science Monitor, 24, 4440-4448.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/MSM.909271
dc.identifier.endpage4448en_US
dc.identifier.issn1234-1010
dc.identifier.pmid29950555
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85049734915
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage4440en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://medscimonit.com/abstract/index/idArt/909271
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/13217
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000437375900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorTacir, İbrahim H.
dc.institutionauthorPolat, Zelal Seyfioğlu
dc.institutionauthorAyna, Emrah
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Scientific Information, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Science Monitor
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesivesen_US
dc.subjectComposite resinsen_US
dc.subjectLight-curing of dental adhesivesen_US
dc.titleComparison of load-bearing capacities of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite adhesive bridges with different framework designsen_US
dc.titleComparison of load-bearing capacities of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite adhesive bridges with different framework designs
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Comparison of load-bearing capacities of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite adhesive bridges with different framework designs.pdf
Boyut:
283.81 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu