Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Tahir
dc.contributor.authorUlku, Sabiha Zelal
dc.contributor.authorZengingul, Ali Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorGuven, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorEratilla, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorSumer, Ebru
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:24:09Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:24:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the amount of marginal gap with two different substructure Materials using identical margin preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty stainless steel models with a chamfer were prepared with a CNC device. Marginal gap measurements of the galvano copings on these stainless steel models and Co-Cr copings obtained by a laser-sintering method were made with a stereomicroscope device before and after the cementation process and surface properties were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A dependent t-test was used to compare the mean of the two groups for normally distributed data, and two-way variance analysis was used for more than two data sets. Pearson's correlation analysis was also performed to assess relationships between variables. REAMS. According to the results obtained, the marginal gap in the galvano copings before cementation was measured as, on average, 24.47 +/- 5.82 mu m before and 35.11 +/- 6.52 mu m after cementation; in the laser-sintered Co-Cr structure, it was, on average, 60.45 +/- 8.87 mu m before and 69.33 +/- 9.03 mu m after cementation. A highly significant difference (P<.001) was found in marginal gap measurements of galvano copings and a significant difference (P<.05) was found in marginal gap measurements of the laser-sintered Co-Cr copings. According to the SEM examination, surface properties of laser sintered Co-Cr copings showed rougher structure than galvano copings. The galvano copings showed a very smooth surface. CONCLUSION. Marginal gaps values of both groups before and after cementation were within the clinically acceptable level. The smallest marginal gaps occurred with the use of galvano copings.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDUAPK-Dicle University Research Project Council (DUBAP) [12-DH-06]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant of the DUAPK-Dicle University Research Project Council (DUBAP) - 12-DH-06).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.257
dc.identifier.endpage263en_US
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26140178
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84934290047
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage257en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.257
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/19472
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000357355900010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Prosthodontics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGalvano Crownsen_US
dc.subjectMarginal Adaptationen_US
dc.subjectLaser Sintered Co-Cren_US
dc.subjectElectroformed Copingen_US
dc.subjectBiocompatibilityen_US
dc.titleEvaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materialsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu