Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of four different adhesives against three bacterial species in two time periods: An in vitro comparative study

dc.authorid0000-0002-6486-1008en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-2048-3065en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4011-5091en_US
dc.contributor.authorÜnal, Samican
dc.contributor.authorBakır, Şeyhmus
dc.contributor.authorBakır, Elif Pınar
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T08:15:37Z
dc.date.available2023-04-19T08:15:37Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The study aimed at evaluating the antibacterial activities of four adhesive systems against three bacterial species in two time periods. Material and Method: Four different antibacterial adhesive materials, a nonantibacterial adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond), and a vancomycin-impregnated antibiogram disc were used in the study. The antibacterial activities of Gluma 2 Bond, Clearfil SE Protect Bond (CPB) Primer, FL Bond II (FLB), and Peak Universal Bond (PUB) on Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Lactobacillus acidophilus were evaluated by the disc diffusion method. Antibiogram discs onto which the adhesive agent was dripped were placed on agar plates at intervals. Inhibition zone diameters around the discs, which were incubated, were measured. Statistical analysis was done with the one-way analysis of variance. Results: As a result of our study, it was concluded that the CPB Primer was the agent with the highest antibacterial activity, including the control group. One of the remarkable findings in our study was that CPB Primer showed the most significant effect against Streptococcus mutans among microorganisms. Although not statistically significant, the antibacterial effect of adhesive agents at the end of the 48th h was found to be higher than at the end of the 24th h (P > .05). Conclusion: The strong antibacterial activity of the CPB Primer on all three bacteria suggests that it is a preferable adhesive agent in deep dentinal caries as well as in initial caries lesions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationÜnal, S., Bakır, Ş. ve Bakır, E.P. (2022). Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of four different adhesives against three bacterial species in two time periods: An in vitro comparative study. Journal of Advanced Oral Research, 13(1), 120-126.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/23202068221084452
dc.identifier.endpage126en_US
dc.identifier.issn2320-2068
dc.identifier.issn2320-2076
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153326683
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage120en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23202068221084452
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/11724
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000796024300017
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorÜnal, Samican
dc.institutionauthorBakır, Şeyhmus
dc.institutionauthorBakır, Elif Pınar
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications INC.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Oral Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive agentsen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial effecten_US
dc.subjectDisk diffusion methoden_US
dc.subjectDental biomaterialsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the antibacterial effects of four different adhesives against three bacterial species in two time periods: An in vitro comparative studyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the antibacterial effects of four different adhesives against three bacterial species in two time periods: An in vitro comparative study
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: