Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching

dc.contributor.authorBasaran, Guevenc
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Torun
dc.contributor.authorKama, Jalan Devecioglu
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:08:05Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:08:05Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this ex vivo study was to compare the bond strengths and modes of failure of brackets bonded with three self-etching products [Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M Espe), Futurabond NR (Voco) and Transbond Plus (3M Unitek)] and a conventional 38 per cent phosphoric acid-etching system Etch-Rite (Pulpdent Corp.) at two different time points. Ninety-six defect-free premolars were randomly allocated to eight groups (n = 12). The etching procedure was carried out according to the manufacturers' instructions. The shear bond strengths (SBSs) were measured after storage in distilled water for 12 and 24 hours. The brackets were debonded using a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Multiple comparisons of the SBSs for the different etching types were performed using analysis of variance. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in adhesive remnant index (CARI) scores among the groups. The differences between SBSs analysed at 12 and 24 hours were not significantly different. Although a significant difference (P < 0.01) was observed with conventional and self-etching primer (SEP) adhesive systems, SEP revealed bond strengths higher than clinically accepted limits (6-8 MPa). SEP systems can achieve successful orthodontic bond strengths. The rate of development of the bond strength must be determined to ensure sufficient maturation of orthodontic adhesives before functional loading.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjn103
dc.identifier.endpage275en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19233930
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-68249149797
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage271en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn103
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/17192
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000266345500008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford Univ Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodontics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keyword]en_US
dc.titleComparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etchingen_US
dc.titleComparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar