Magnetic Compression Ostomy for Simple Tube Colostomy in Rats - Magnacolostomy

dc.contributor.authorUygun, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorOkur, Mehmet H.
dc.contributor.authorArayici, Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Hayrettin
dc.contributor.authorOtcu, Selcuk
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:37:37Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:37:37Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Magnetic compression anastomoses (magnamosis) have been previously described for gastrointestinal, biliary, urinary, and vascular anastomoses. Objectives. Herein, the authors report the creation of a magnetic compression colostomy (magnacolostomy) using a simple technique in rats. Material and Methods Animals were randomized into two groups (n = 8, each): a magnetic colostomy (MC) group and a control surgical tube colostomy (SC) group. In the MC group, the first magnetic ball (3 mm) was rectally introduced into the rat colon. The second magnetic ball (4 mm) was placed subcutaneously into the left quadrant, and the two magnetic balls strongly coupled. On postoperative day 20 for the MC group and postoperative day 10 in the SC group, the rats were sacrificed and the colostomies evaluated macroscopically, histopathologically, and for mechanical burst testing. Results. From the macroscopic evaluation, two rats failed to form the colostomy canal due to colostomy catheter and magnetic ball removal. In the remaining rats, evidence of complications were not observed. Two rats in the MC group displayed mild adhesion and all rats in the SC group displayed moderate adhesion. No significant differences between the burst pressures were observed. However, a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the procedure times of the MC (4.13 +/- 1.00 minutes) and SC groups (14.25 +/- 2.05 minutes) was evident. Conclusions: Magnacolostomy is an easy and effective procedure in the rat model and presents a safe, minimally invasive alternative to current tube colostomy procedures such as antegrade continence enemas, percutaneous endoscopic, and colostomy/cecostomy in humans (Adv Clin Exp Med 2012, 21, 3, 301-305).en_US
dc.identifier.endpage305en_US
dc.identifier.issn1899-5276
dc.identifier.issn2451-2680
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23214192en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84863758590en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage301en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/21079
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000308117500003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWroclaw Medical Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Clinical and Experimental Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectColostomyen_US
dc.subjectMagnacolostomyen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Compression Anastomosisen_US
dc.subjectMagnostomyen_US
dc.titleMagnetic Compression Ostomy for Simple Tube Colostomy in Rats - Magnacolostomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar