The evaluation of microleakage and fluoride release of different types of glass ionomer cements

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBahsi, E.
dc.contributor.authorSagmak, S.
dc.contributor.authorDayi, B.
dc.contributor.authorCellik, O.
dc.contributor.authorAkkus, Z.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:24:17Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate six different glass ionomer cement (GIC)-based restorative materials through comparisons of microleakage and fluoride release. Materials and Methods: For microleakage, 30 teeth were randomly separated into 6 groups of 5: Group 1 (Dyract: compomer), Group 2 (Freedom: compomer), Group 3 (Equia: high-viscosity glass ionomer cements), Group 4 (Fuji IX: resin-modified glass ionomer cement), Group 5 (Ketac Molar: traditional glass ionomer cement [TGIC]) and Group 6 (Voco: TGIC). For fluoride release of six different GIC-based restorative materials, standard samples were prepared of 4 mm thickness and 7 mm diameter. A total of 60 samples were obtained as 10 samples from each group. The analyses were made using a Thermo Orion 720 A+ ionometer with the Orion fluoride electrode. At the end of 24 h, 72 h, 7 days, 14 days, and 30 days, the electrode was placed into the dish containing the sample, distilled water, and TISAB II; a reading was taken; and the value shown on the screen was recorded. Results: For microleakage, a statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of the occlusal variable (P < 0.05), no statistically significant gingival variable (P 0.05). About fluoride release: According to the repeated measures variance analysis results, the difference between the groups, and between the time-group interaction and according to time, was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In terms of microleakage, it was concluded that all materials could be used in clinical applications. The Equia high-viscosity glass ionomer cements (HVGIC) was determined to be the material with the highest fluoride release value.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_644_18
dc.identifier.endpage970en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31293262
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068911809
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage961en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_644_18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/19581
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000474919400014
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFluoride Releaseen_US
dc.subjectGlass Ionomer Cementen_US
dc.subjectMicroleakageen_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of microleakage and fluoride release of different types of glass ionomer cementsen_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of microleakage and fluoride release of different types of glass ionomer cements
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu