A FIELD-TRIAL OF TWO RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED WITH ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT IN RURAL TURKEY: 24-MONTH RESULTS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.authorDulgergil, C. Turksel
dc.contributor.authorSoyman, Muebin
dc.contributor.authorDalli, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Isil
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:18:11Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:18:11Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical performance of high-strength glass ionomer cement (HSGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) in single and multiple surface carious cavities in the field conditions. Material and Methods: A split-mouth design, including ninety-one fillings placed on contra lateral molar pairs of 37 children, was used in permanent dentition. As filling materials, a HSGIC (Ketac Molar/3M ESPE) and a RMGIC (Vitremer/3M ESPE) were used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Baseline and 6, 12 and 24-month evaluations of the fillings were made with standard-ART and USPHS criteria by two examiners with kappa values of 0.92 and 0.87 for both criteria. Results: According to the USPHS criteria, the retention rates of RMGIC and HSGIC restorations were 100% and 80.9% for single surface, and 100% and 41.2% for multiple surface restorations after 24 months, respectively. Irrespective of surface number, RMGIC was significantly superior to HSGIC (p=0.004), according to both standard-ART and USPHS criteria. Conclusion: The results indicate that RMGIC may be an alternative restorative technique in comparison to high-strength GIC applications in ART-field-trials. However, further clinical and field trials are needed to support this conclusion.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-77572009000400008
dc.identifier.endpage314en_US
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19668990
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-69249135438
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage307en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000400008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/18653
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269124200008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniv Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauruen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtraumatic Restorative Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectArten_US
dc.subjectGlass-Ionomer Cementsen_US
dc.subjectResin-Modified Glass-Ionomeren_US
dc.subjectLight Emitted Diode (Led)en_US
dc.titleA FIELD-TRIAL OF TWO RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED WITH ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT IN RURAL TURKEY: 24-MONTH RESULTSen_US
dc.titleA FIELD-TRIAL OF TWO RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED WITH ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT IN RURAL TURKEY: 24-MONTH RESULTS
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu