Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the primary treatment of encrusted ureteral stents

dc.contributor.authorIrkilata, Lokman
dc.contributor.authorOzgur, Berat Cem
dc.contributor.authorSancaktutar, Ahmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorAkdeniz, Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Huseyin Cihan
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Hasan Riza
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T15:59:54Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T15:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractDouble pigtail (JJ) ureteral stents, are the most commonly used method of urinary diversion in the ureteral obstructions. Encrustations may occur as a result of prolonged exposure due to forgetting these stents in the body. Removing these materials might be an annoyance. Forty-four patients from three tertiary referral centres with forgotten JJ stents left in them between the years 2007 and 2014 were included in the study. Stents could not be removed by attempted cystoscopy. As an alternative approach, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was the first choice since it is minimally invasive. The results of that treatment are presented along with the relevant demographic data. JJ stenting for urolithiasis was performed in 36 patients, after open surgery in five patients, and for oncological reasons in three patients. ESWL was applied to stents or to any suspicious region adjacent to the stent. In 29 of 44 patients, the stents were easily removed under cystoscopic procedures while in one patient the fragmented residual stent was spontaneously excreted. In eight patients, ureteroscopy was required; in five patients, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was required; and in one patient, open surgery was required in order to remove stents. ESWL can be considered as a first-line treatment when a forgotten JJ stent is detected despite all precautions after any kind of urological intervention involving insertion of ureteral stents.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-015-0782-4
dc.identifier.endpage384en_US
dc.identifier.issn2194-7228
dc.identifier.issn2194-7236
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25981234
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84938212638
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage379en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0782-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/14300
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000358089500012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrolithiasis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectUrolithiasisen_US
dc.subjectDouble Pigtail Ureteral Stentsen_US
dc.subjectEncrustationen_US
dc.subjectExtracorporeal Shock Waveen_US
dc.subjectLithotripsyen_US
dc.titleExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the primary treatment of encrusted ureteral stentsen_US
dc.titleExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the primary treatment of encrusted ureteral stents
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar