Relation between electrophysiological findings and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

dc.contributor.authorAltun, Yasar
dc.contributor.authorAygun, Murat Serhat
dc.contributor.authorCevik, Mehmet Ugur
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorVarol, Sefer
dc.contributor.authorArikanoglu, Adalet
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:15:44Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:15:44Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: As only a limited number of studies have used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), the present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the non-invasive DWI technique in patients with UNE. Methods: A total of 26 elbows in 19 healthy controls (age range: 22-56 years) with no symptoms and 24 elbows in 21 symptomatic patients (age range: 21-46 years) with cubital tunnel syndrome underwent DWI. The electrophysiological and clinical criteria for the diagnosis of UNE were examined. Results: No pathological signal from the ulnar nerve was detected in the healthy controls, whereas there was an increase in signals on DWI in all patients with UNE. On T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, there was increased signal intensity in 20 elbows, while low signal intensity was observed in the remaining four. A positive correlation was found between disease duration and presence of hyperintensity (P = 0.044, r = 0.42) on T2W images. Conclusion: DWI can be used together with electrophysiological methods for the diagnosis of UNE. Furthermore, DWI might be preferred in some cases, as it is non-invasive compared with the electrophysiological method for UNE diagnosis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neurad.2012.08.004
dc.identifier.endpage266en_US
dc.identifier.issn0150-9861
dc.identifier.issn1773-0406
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23806366
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84885835137
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage260en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2012.08.004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/15908
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000326954100004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMasson Editeuren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Neuroradiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectUlnar Nerve Entrapment Neuropathyen_US
dc.subjectDiffusion Magnetic Resonanceen_US
dc.subjectElectrophysiologyen_US
dc.titleRelation between electrophysiological findings and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in ulnar neuropathy at the elbowen_US
dc.titleRelation between electrophysiological findings and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar