EFFECT OF MACHINABILITY OF GNP-GFRP COMPOSITES ON TENSILE STRENGTH AND FATIGUE BEHAVIOR

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTopkaya, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Yahya Hisman
dc.contributor.authorKilickap, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:12:03Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:12:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe paper focuses on the cutting behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composites and GNP-GFRP composites that contain varying amounts of Graphene Nano Platelets (GNP). GFRP composites are increasingly being used in a variety of industrial applications due to their excellent mechanical properties, such as high strength, stiffness, and low weight. However, their machining and cutting behavior can be challenging due to the presence of the reinforcing fibers. Therefore, the study aims to investigate the machining behavior of GFRP composites and the effect of adding GNP on their cutting behavior. The effect of different parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate and reinforcement rate on cutting forces and delamination factor is investigated. In addition, the tensile strength and fatigue behavior of the composite materials with the best and worst delamination factors were also determined. Addition of up to 0.2 wt.% of GNP to GFRP composites resulted in an increase in cutting forces and delamination factor when drilling GFRP composites. While the cutting force and delamination factor decreased with the increase in cutting speed, the cutting force and delamination factor increased with the increase in the feed rate. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the effects of drilling parameters and reinforcement ratio on cutting force and delamination factor according to full factorial experimental design. The most efficient factor on the cutting forces is found to be feed rate (84.97%), followed by the reinforced rate (6.48%) and cutting speed (6.13%). The most efficient factor on the delamination factor is determined to be feed rate for (44.49%), followed by the reinforced rate (29.20%) and cutting speed (21.73%).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1142/S0218625X24500422
dc.identifier.issn0218-625X
dc.identifier.issn1793-6667
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85178152973
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X24500422
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/17834
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001109673700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWorld Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurface Review and Letters
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGrapheneen_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.subjectGfrpen_US
dc.subjectDrillingen_US
dc.titleEFFECT OF MACHINABILITY OF GNP-GFRP COMPOSITES ON TENSILE STRENGTH AND FATIGUE BEHAVIORen_US
dc.titleEFFECT OF MACHINABILITY OF GNP-GFRP COMPOSITES ON TENSILE STRENGTH AND FATIGUE BEHAVIOR
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu