Is HbA1c Misleading and 90-Minute Glucose Tolerance Test a Better Indicator in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTuzcu, Alpaslan Kemal
dc.contributor.authorGüneş, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorPekkolay, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorKılınç, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorBeyaz, Coşkun
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T19:11:50Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T19:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in diagnosing type 2 diabetesand to introduce a new approach to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 560 subjects (363 females, 197 males) with a mean age of46.7±12.9 years. These subjects underwent a standard 75-g OGTT, plasma glucose levels were assayed at 0, 30, 60, 90,and 120 minutes in 232 subjects who consented to these tests, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. HbA1clevels were also measured simultaneously. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to determine thesensitivity and specificity of certain HbA1c cut-off values in diagnosing diabetes in subjects who underwent OGTT. Chisquare test was used for data comparisons, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationshipbetween the measurements.Results: Among the 560 subjects, 129 had diabetes and 40 of the 232 subjects who were frequently tested for glucoselevels had diabetes. The sensitivity and specificity of the HbA1c cut-off value of 6.5% in diagnosing diabetes were 55.0%and 80.9%, respectively. The highest correlation was observed between the glucose level at 90 minutes and AUC andHbA1c (r=0.971, P<0.01; r=0.464, P<0.01, respectively).Conclusion: An HbA1c cut-off value of 6.5% had low sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing diabetes. The plasma glucoselevel at 90 minutes in subjects had the best correlation with both AUC and HbA1c, indicating that using plasma glucoselevel at 90 minute is a better approach for diagnosing diabetes.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5798/dicletip.706051
dc.identifier.endpage104en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-2945
dc.identifier.issn1308-9889
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage97en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid370640
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.706051
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/370640
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/28219
dc.identifier.volume47en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDicle Tıp Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleIs HbA1c Misleading and 90-Minute Glucose Tolerance Test a Better Indicator in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus?en_US
dc.titleIs HbA1c Misleading and 90-Minute Glucose Tolerance Test a Better Indicator in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus?
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Dicle Tıp Dergisi