A Comparison of the Results of Many-Facet Rasch Analyses Based on Crossed and Judge Pair Designs

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorIlhan, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:15:10Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:15:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the results of many-facet Rasch analyses based on crossed and judge pair designs. The study was conducted with 168 eighth grade students and five judges. The study data were collected using an achievement test with open-ended questions and a holistic rubric that was used to rate the responses. In the data collection process, the achievement test was initially administered to students. The students' responses were rated by five judges; the ratings provided the data set for the crossed design. In the judge pair design, the students' responses to the test items were rated by any two of the five judges. Then the researcher conducted the many-facet Rasch analysis and compared the analysis outputs of the two designs. It was determined that the difference between the elements of the facets included in the analysis was demonstrated more effectively in the crossed design than the judge pair design. In the judge pair design, however, the study made significant distinctions between the elements of the facets. Moreover, the study found that the relative agreement between the ability estimations calculated based on crossed and judge pair designs was very high, and there was no significant difference between the ability estimations reported by the two designs. Therefore, it is preferable to choose judge pair design for examinations with a large number of participants as it will be less costly.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12738/estp.2016.2.0390
dc.identifier.endpage601en_US
dc.identifier.issn2630-5984
dc.identifier.issn2148-7561
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage579en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid203937
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0390
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/203937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/18361
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000376119800011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdamen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEducational Sciences-Theory & Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMany-Facet Rasch Modelen_US
dc.subjectCrossed Designen_US
dc.subjectJudge Pair Designen_US
dc.subjectOpen-Ended Itemsen_US
dc.subjectAbility Estimationen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of the Results of Many-Facet Rasch Analyses Based on Crossed and Judge Pair Designsen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of the Results of Many-Facet Rasch Analyses Based on Crossed and Judge Pair Designs
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu