Misoprostol-induced termination of second-trimester pregnancy in women with a history of cesarean section: A retrospective analysis of 56 cases
dc.contributor.author | Turgut, Abdulkadir | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozler, Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Goruk, Neval Yaman | |
dc.contributor.author | Karacor, Talip | |
dc.contributor.author | Yalinkaya, Ahmet | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-24T17:45:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-24T17:45:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To assess the effectivity and safety of misoprostol induced termination of pregnancy in the second trimester in women with a history of previous caesarean section. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of case records from the obstetrics and gynecology department of a tertiary care center between January 2009 and February 2012 was performed. Data derived from 219 women, who underwent a second trimester termination of pregnancy was analyzed in terms of demographics, clinical findings, laboratory and procedural data. The study group consisted of 56 women with a previous caesarean section and the control group was composed of 163 women without such a history Termination of pregnancies was conducted by administration of misoprostol at doses of 50-600 mcg intravaginally or by surgical evacuation in cases of failure of medical measures. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of demographics such as age, menarche, number of pregnancies or live births, smoking habit and co-morbidities. Necessity for blood transfusion (p=0.05) and additional procedure for abortion (p=0.056) were found to be similar in both groups. However, laparotomy (p=0.004), uterine rupture (p=0.016), hysterotomy (p<0.001) were performed more frequently in the study group; while abortion was more likely to occur within 24 hours in the control group (p=0.031). Conclusion: Medical abortion must be carefully used for the termination of second trimester pregnancies in women with a history of CS. Increased possibility of uterine rupture and requirement of interventions such as laparotomy or hysterotomy is more likely in these patients. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 280 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0017-0011 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23700860 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 277 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/22436 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 84 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000321414600006 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Studio K | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ginekologia Polska | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Second Trimester | en_US |
dc.subject | Abortion | en_US |
dc.subject | Cesarean Section | en_US |
dc.subject | Misoprostol | en_US |
dc.title | Misoprostol-induced termination of second-trimester pregnancy in women with a history of cesarean section: A retrospective analysis of 56 cases | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |