Comparison of Balloon-Expandable and Self-Expandable Valves in Patients with Transcatater Aortic Valve Implantation in Terms of Demographic and Complications and Evaluation of the Predictors of Complications: A Retrospective Single Center Experience

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKiliç R.
dc.contributor.authorGüzel T.
dc.contributor.authorAktan A.
dc.contributor.authorArslan B.
dc.contributor.authorErtaş F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:58:23Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:58:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) offers an alternative to surgery for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Currently, the most commonly used valves for clinical use are the Balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN and Self-expandable CoreValve Revalving valves. The aim of our study is to compare these valve types used in TAVI procedures performed in our center and to determine the predictors of complications. Material and Methods: 96 patients who underwent TAVI in our center were included in our study. Pre-procedural clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic data of patients who underwent TAVI were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Complications developed in 31 (32.3%) of the patients. Total complications were found to be higher in patients with balloon-expandable valve (18 vs. 13, p=0.036, respectively). In patients who developed complications, hemoglobin and hematocrit values at the time of admission to the hospital were found to be significantly lower, and C-reactive protein was found to be high. Among the echocardiographic findings at admission, the aortic valve area was found to be narrower and the maximum and mean gradient was higher in patients with complications. Conclusion: In our study, a lower complication rate was observed in self-expandable valves. Some independent markers of TAVI-specific complications and mortality were identified. Examination of new predictors and development of a TAVI-specific scoring system may be considered in future prospective controlled studies. 2146-9032 / Copyright © 2023 by Türkiye Klinikleri. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/cardiosci.2023-96212
dc.identifier.endpage20en_US
dc.identifier.issn1306-7656
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174909508en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage13en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1258832en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/cardiosci.2023-96212
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/23887
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOrtadogŸu Reklam Tanitim Yayincilik Turizm Egitim Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Klinikleri Cardiovascular Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAortic Valve Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectAortic Valve Stenosisen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacementen_US
dc.titleComparison of Balloon-Expandable and Self-Expandable Valves in Patients with Transcatater Aortic Valve Implantation in Terms of Demographic and Complications and Evaluation of the Predictors of Complications: A Retrospective Single Center Experienceen_US
dc.title.alternativeTranskatater Aort Kapak İmplantasyonu Olan Hastalarda Balonla Genişleyebilir ve Kendinden Genişleyebilir Kapakların Demografik ve Komplikasyonlar Açısından Karşılaştırılması ve Komplikasyonların Öngördürücülerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Tek Merkez Deneyimien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu