The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer
dc.authorid | UCAR, GOKHAN/0000-0002-7649-1075 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ucar, Gokhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Sekmek, Serhat | |
dc.contributor.author | Karahan, Irfan | |
dc.contributor.author | Ergun, Yakup | |
dc.contributor.author | Isak, ozlem Aydin | |
dc.contributor.author | Tunc, Sezai | |
dc.contributor.author | Dogan, Mutlu | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-22T14:08:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-22T14:08:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve the success of management. Different regimens were examined. The present study purposed to compare the efficacy of fl uorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin-docetaxel (FLOT) and docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimens. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study assessed the patients with loco regional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared. Results: Demographic features were similar between the two groups, but the time period was different. The FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while the DCF group did not. Disease-free survival was longer in the FLOT than in the DCF group (median not reached - 13.94 months, respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs. 37.8 months), but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for the FLOT group and 40% for the DCF group (log-rank; p = 0.015). Conclusion: FLOT regimen was superior to DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment. (c) 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1159/000540517 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0030-2414 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1423-0232 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 39079501 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1159/000540517 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/29672 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001356204700001 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Karger | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Oncology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20250222 | |
dc.subject | Gastric cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Perioperative treatment | en_US |
dc.subject | FLOT | en_US |
dc.subject | DCF | en_US |
dc.title | The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |