Experimental comparison of the energy parameters of HFCs used as alternatives to HCFC-22 in split type air conditioners
dc.contributor.author | Oruc, Vedat | |
dc.contributor.author | Devecioglu, Atilla G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Berk, Ugur | |
dc.contributor.author | Vural, Ibrahim | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-24T16:14:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-24T16:14:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The R22 refrigerant widely used in refrigerating and air conditioning devices is invariably released to the atmosphere due to reasons such as breakdown and/or translocation. As the sales of new devices operating with R22 are decreasing gradually, refrigerants of such available devices should be changed with the ones that are not depleting the ozone layer. In this paper, the amount of consumed energy, cooling capacity and COP values of R417A, R422A, R422D and R424A, which can be used as alternatives to R22, were determined experimentally for a split type air conditioning device at the ambient temperatures of 35, 38 and 41 degrees C. Basically, COP values of all HFC refrigerants were found to be smaller than that of R22. It was noted that the most suitable refrigerating fluid was R424A, which can be used instead of R22, since the COP of R424A was smaller than that of R22 by 2.5% only at an ambient temperature of 41 degrees C. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and International Institute of Refrigeration. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) [113M059] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The experimental investigation was financially supported by TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) through research project no. 113M059. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.11.004 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 132 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-7007 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-2081 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84955246714 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 125 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.11.004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/15515 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 63 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000375000600012 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Sci Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Refrigeration-Revue Internationale Du Froid | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Drop-In | en_US |
dc.subject | R22 | en_US |
dc.subject | Alternative Refrigerants | en_US |
dc.subject | Cop | en_US |
dc.title | Experimental comparison of the energy parameters of HFCs used as alternatives to HCFC-22 in split type air conditioners | en_US |
dc.title | Experimental comparison of the energy parameters of HFCs used as alternatives to HCFC-22 in split type air conditioners | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |