The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations

dc.authorid0000-0001-9111-6962en_US
dc.contributor.authorÜnal, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAtakul, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T10:49:57Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T10:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different adhesive systems in amalgam restorations and their effects on microleakage. Methodology: In this study, 105 caries-free extracted human permanent molar teeth were used. Teeth were randomly assigned to five groups (n=21), and class I cavities were created on the surface of each tooth. The first was a control group to which no adhesive system was applied. Amalgam Liner (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven Germany) was applied to Group II, Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group III, Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group IV, Amalgambond Plus (Parkell Inc.Edgewood, NY USA) was applied to Group V, and then amalgam (Tytin, Kerr, California USA) restorations were placed. After the polishing process, samples were subjected to thermocycling 1,000 times. Teeth were sectioned buccopalatinally/lingually, and microleakage scores of the occlusal walls were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 15X magnification by a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 4. One tooth was selected randomly from each group for SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope), and SEM LEO EVO 40 (LEO Ltd., Cambridge UK) photographs of amalgam-tooth hard tissue interfaces were also taken at different magnifications. The results of the microleakage tests were statistically analyzed by both the Kruskal-Wallis Test and the Mann Whitney U Test. Results: In terms of microleakage among groups, the differences that were determined were significant (p<0.05). Microleakage within the control group was determined to be the highest, and statistically important differences were observed between the other groups. Group V (Amalgambond Plus) was determined to have the lowest microleakage scores. Conclusion: In prepared class I cavities, amalgam adhesive systems are effective in preventing occlusal microleakage but do not completely blocked it.en_US
dc.identifier.citationÜnal, M. ve Atakul, F. (2021). The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. International Dental Research, 11(2), 83-92.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage92en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-1767
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage83en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinidTRDizinIdYok
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/482261
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/10605
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorAtakul, Fatma
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUluslararası Diş Araştırmaları Birliğien_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dental Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental amalgamen_US
dc.subjectAdhesiveen_US
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopeen_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorationsen_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations.pdf
Boyut:
695.85 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: