Cerebral hydatid disease

dc.contributor.authorBiikte, Y
dc.contributor.authorKemanoglu, S
dc.contributor.authorNazaroglu, H
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Ü
dc.contributor.authorCeviz, A
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, M
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:40:10Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:40:10Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Cerebral hydatid disease is very rare, representing only 2% of all cerebral space occupying lesions even in the countries where the disease is endemic. The aim of this paper is to describe the characteristic features of cerebral hydatid disease in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the CT and MR imaging findings of 18 patients with pathologically confirmed cerebral hydatid disease over a period of 13 years (1990-2002). Results: The study group consisted of 17 cases of Echinococcus granulosus and 1 case of Echinococcus multilocularis (alveolaris). They were 12 male (66.7%), and 6 female patients (33.3%), ages ranging from 7 to 50 years with an average age of 20.3 years. Headache, vomiting and seizures were the predominant symptoms. Papilloedema was present in 14 patients (77.7%). Common CT and MR imaging findings of E. granulosus lesions were well-defined, smooth thin-walled, spherical, homogeneous cystic lesions with no contrast enhancement, no calcification, and no surrounding oedema. The lesion seen with E. multilocularis was a well-defined multiseptated mass consisting of solid and cystic components with calcification in the solid portion. Cystic lesions with surrounding hyperintensity of perifocal oedema with complete or incomplete rim enhancement were seen in two patients, and were labeled as complicated and infected cysts. Conclusion: Although cystic cerebral hydatid disease is well demonstrated by CT and MR examinations, CT is superior in detecting calcification in the cyst, when present, MR is better in demonstrating cyst capsule, detecting multiplicity and defining the anatomic relationship of the lesion with the adjacent structures, and it is more helpful in surgical planning.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1424-7860
dc.identifier.issn1424-3997
dc.identifier.issue31-32en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15389350
dc.identifier.startpage459en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/21655
dc.identifier.volume134en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000223819900004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE M H Swiss Medical Publishers Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofSwiss Medical Weekly
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCerebral Hydatid Diseaseen_US
dc.subjectEchinococcosisen_US
dc.subjectComputer Tomography (Ct)en_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)en_US
dc.titleCerebral hydatid diseaseen_US
dc.titleCerebral hydatid disease
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar