Evaluation of Bond Strength of Different Repair Methods Applied in PEEK Infrastructure Restorations

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Berivan Dundar
dc.contributor.authorCetinkaya, Numan
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Zelal Seyfioglu
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Server Mutluay
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Mehmet Cudi
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:33:50Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriate intraoral repair procedures in PEEK (polyetheretherketone) restorations when there is a veneer fracture. STUDY DESIGN: The study groups were formed according to the presence or absence of fractured veneer material of PEEK restorations. PEEK specimens (N = 91) were prepared with CAD/CAM in dimensions of 5 x 5.4 x 13 mm and divided into 13 groups including the positive control group. 5000 thermocyclic was applied to the specimens, and then the repair bond strength (RBS) was made at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The fracture surfaces of the specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope. SEM, EDX, XRD, AFM, and surface contact angle analyses were performed in terms of roughened surfaces of PEEK (N = 16). One-way ANOVA and independent sample t test were used for data analysis (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The efficiency of surface treatment, the roughness and wettability of the acid and Co-Jet groups have increased. Acid etching was found to be the most effective surface treatment. The RBS values of the Super-Bond groups in the repair procedures were found to be higher than the Visio.link group and were statistically significant (p = 0.002). When evaluating failure modes, the mode most encountered among all groups was the mixed mode, and least was the cohesive mode. CONCLUSION: The presence or absence of fractured veneer during the repair of PEEK-based restorations does not affect the values of repair bond strength, and RBS values were also not statistically significant.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage11en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-6812
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129286030
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/20859
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000765843100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSci Printers & Publ Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnalytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBonding Strengthen_US
dc.subjectDental Repairsen_US
dc.subjectDental Restorationsen_US
dc.subjectPeeken_US
dc.subjectPolyetheretherketoneen_US
dc.subjectPolymersen_US
dc.subjectProsthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectSurface Rougheningen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Bond Strength of Different Repair Methods Applied in PEEK Infrastructure Restorationsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Bond Strength of Different Repair Methods Applied in PEEK Infrastructure Restorations
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu