A comparison of microleakage scores of five different types of composite resins

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDallı, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBahşi, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorŞahbaz, Cafer
dc.contributor.authorİnce, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorAkkuş, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertuǧrul
dc.contributor.authorAtılgan, Serhat S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:58:13Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:58:13Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız ve Diş Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of microleakage in Class V cavities among five different composite resins. For this purpose 100 fresh caries-free human permanent molars were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n=20). Clearfil Majesty Esthetic + Clearfil S3 Bond (Group I), TPH Spectrum + Xeno V (Group II), Gradia Direct Anterior + G Bond (GC) (Group III), Premise + Optibond All in One (Group IV) and Charisma + iBond (Group V) were applied and polymerized under LED. Specimens were varnished, immersed in 0.5% methylene and sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually, and microleakage scores were determined. Gingival and occlusal microleakage scores among groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) (p=0.043, p=0.005). Occlusal microleakage scores for Clearfil Majesty Esthetic and Premise were lower than in the other groups. Charisma had the highest microleakage scores, with no difference among the other groups (p>0.05). In conclusion occlusal and gingival microleakage scores were satisfactory except for Charisma.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDallı, M., Bahşi, E., Şahbaz, C., İnce, B., Akkuş, Z., Ercan, E. ve diğerleri. (2010). A comparison of microleakage scores of five different types of composite resins. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 24(4), 2122-2126.
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10133-010-0075-6
dc.identifier.endpage2126en_US
dc.identifier.issn1310-2818
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78649789313
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage2122en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2478/v10133-010-0075-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/23718
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000284717900017
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDiagnosis Press Limited.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCervical Lesionen_US
dc.subjectDifferent Composite Resinsen_US
dc.subjectMethylene Blueen_US
dc.subjectMicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Etching Adhesive Systemsen_US
dc.titleA comparison of microleakage scores of five different types of composite resinsen_US
dc.titleA comparison of microleakage scores of five different types of composite resins
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu