Does the eltrompobag treatment safe or effective for refractory chronic immune thrombocytopenia patients?
dc.contributor.author | Dal, Mehmet Sinan | |
dc.contributor.author | Karakus, Abdullah | |
dc.contributor.author | Cakar, Merih Kizil | |
dc.contributor.author | Ulu, Bahar Uncu | |
dc.contributor.author | Hattapoglu, Elif | |
dc.contributor.author | Ekmen, Mehmet Onder | |
dc.contributor.author | Ulas, Turgay | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-24T17:33:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-24T17:33:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder characterized by immune-mediated platelet destruction and reduced platelet production. As the pathophysiology of the disease got clear, thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) agonists have been preferred in recent years, which seems to be an effective option in the treatment of resistant cases. Eltrombopag, a TPO-R agonist, is a second or third line medical treatment option for adults with chronic ITP. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of long-term eltrombopag treatment in treatment-refractory patients with primary ITP was the aim of this study. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data of 34 patients with refractory ITP who were treated with eltrombopag were examined. Efficacy and safety of the eltrombopag treatment was evaluated. Results: The total rate of response was 82%, and the median duration of response defined as the number of the platelets being over 50x10(9)/L was 14 (interquartile range: 7-28) days. In two patients, thrombosis was observed with no other additional risk factors due to or related to thrombosis. Conclusion: In spite of the fact that the responses to eltrombopag were satisfactory, patients need to be monitored closely for increasing platelet counts as well as thromboembolic events. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 18711 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1940-5901 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84989171909 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 18707 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/20721 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000386671100205 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | E-Century Publishing Corp | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Immune Thrombocytopenia | en_US |
dc.subject | Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist | en_US |
dc.subject | Thrombosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Eltrombopag | en_US |
dc.title | Does the eltrompobag treatment safe or effective for refractory chronic immune thrombocytopenia patients? | en_US |
dc.title | Does the eltrompobag treatment safe or effective for refractory chronic immune thrombocytopenia patients? | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |