The determination of qualities in different whole-plant silages among hybrid maize cultivars

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSaruhan, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Dilek Senturk
dc.contributor.authorAkinci, Cuma
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Firat
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:28:07Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:28:07Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted in order to determine the effects of 12 maize hybrids (Goldeclat, Falkner, Maverik, Tivak 6661, Tivak 678, Bora, Consur, DK 626, Ada 9510, Pioneer 3167, TTM 815, and LG 55) on the nutrient composition (that is, dry matter - DM, crude ash - CA, organic matter - OM, crude protein - CP, ether extract - EE, crude fiber - CF), pH, Fleig point (FP) values, and the mineral contents of maize silages. The maize hybrids were harvested at the milk-line maturity stage and ensiled as whole plant in 5-L plastic jars without additives. The jars were stored at 25 +/- 2 degrees C under standard laboratory conditions. the silages were uncovered and sampled for chemical analyses 60 days after they were ensilaged. There were statistically significant differences among maize hybrid silages for DM, CA, OM, CP, EE, CF contents, pH, and FP values (P<0.05). The DM content of silages were ranged from 25.67% in LG 55 to 32.41% in Falkner; CP (4.07% in Bora and LG 55 to 6.91% in Tivak 678); CA (4.64% in Maverik to 7.94% in LG 55); OM (17.07% in LG 55 to 27.64% in Falkner); EE (2.68% in DK 626 to 4.40% in Tivak 678); CF (17.96% in Pioneer 3167 to 27.28% in TTM 815); pH value (3.76 in TTM 815 to 4.05 in Pioneer 3167); FP (95.68 in LG 55 to 112.64 in Consur). The result of the study indicated that fermentation characteristics and nutrient contents were affected by the hybrids that were studied. However, there were no significant differences among dry matter mineral contents for As, B, Cr, Fe, Sn, Cu, Mn, and Zn (P>0.05); but there were significant differences among hybrids for Al (P<0.05).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5897/AJAR11.1249
dc.identifier.endpage5474en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-637X
dc.identifier.issue24en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80755147208
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage5469en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.1249
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/20334
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000298784800013
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Journal of Agricultural Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMaizeen_US
dc.subjectNutrienten_US
dc.subjectQuality Criteriaen_US
dc.subjectRoughageen_US
dc.subjectSilage Mineral Contenten_US
dc.titleThe determination of qualities in different whole-plant silages among hybrid maize cultivarsen_US
dc.titleThe determination of qualities in different whole-plant silages among hybrid maize cultivars
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu